ExposeIQ expands JuryFit for civil rights jury selection

ExposeIQ says it has expanded JuryFit to help civil rights litigators analyze juror attitudes, biases and case fit more systematically during jury selection. The Orlando-based company says the platform also uses human-verified simulations to test arguments and damages themes before trial.

Why it matters: - Civil rights trials can turn on how jurors view race, policing, discrimination and constitutional rights. - ExposeIQ says JuryFit is designed to help trial teams spot juror attitudes and biases that could affect credibility, liability and damages decisions. - The platform is meant to add structure to a process where personal beliefs can strongly influence outcomes.

What happened: - ExposeIQ announced expanded capabilities in its JuryFit platform for civil rights litigation. - The Orlando, Florida-based company says the update is aimed at helping attorneys approach jury selection with more analytical support. - ExposeIQ said the platform is intended for cases involving constitutional rights and systemic issues.

The details: - JuryFit analyzes case theories against multiple juror dimensions, including demographics, life experiences, attitudes, beliefs, political and social values, personality and cognitive traits, and implicit and explicit biases. - The platform identifies combinations of those factors that may shape how jurors respond to a theory of the case. - Licensed professionals verify all assessments so the analysis stays tied to the facts of the matter. - JuryFit generates targeted voir dire questions for jury selection. - Those questions also go through human verification before use. - After a jury is seated, the platform lets attorneys test arguments, credibility themes and damages presentations against a Virtual Mirror Jury™. - ExposeIQ says the simulation is built to reflect the personality profiles and group dynamics of the actual seated jurors. - Human verification also reviews the Virtual Mirror Jury outputs. - Joseph Terp, co-founder and CEO of ExposeIQ, said jurors in civil rights cases often bring strong views on fairness, authority and equality that can shape how they assess evidence.

Between the lines: - The product pitch combines analytics with human review, signaling an attempt to avoid fully automated jury consulting. - The focus on civil rights cases suggests ExposeIQ is targeting high-stakes matters where jury psychology may matter as much as legal doctrine. - The company is framing jury selection as a repeatable process rather than a purely intuitive one.

What's next: - ExposeIQ says the platform is intended to support more consistent jury selection in civil rights matters. - Trial teams keep final professional judgment over jury decisions. - The company’s broader litigation-intelligence tools are built to help attorneys analyze complex case information and juror dynamics with more structure. - ExposeIQ says its products combine advanced technology with human professional oversight to support more informed decision-making throughout litigation.

The bottom line: - ExposeIQ is betting that human-verified jury analytics can give civil rights litigators a clearer read on juror bias before and during trial. - More information is available on the company’s social profiles: Joseph Terp on LinkedIn and Joseph Terp on X.